BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:427695e6e4d8cce6770d2f43c76d1dd0
CATEGORIES:Seminars
CREATED:20220103T091346
SUMMARY:Michela Tincani - UCL
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:<p><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><strong>Pr
 eferential College Admissions for the Disadvantaged: The Role of Social Mec
 hanisms and Subjective Beliefs</strong>” with F. Kosse and E. Miglino</span
 ></p><p><strong><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black
 ;">Abstract:</span></strong></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style
 ="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Many countries use prefe
 rential college admissions to provide opportunities to talented disadvantag
 ed students. Exploiting a randomized experiment in Chile, we find that pref
 erential admissions increased college admissions and enrollments of the dis
 advantaged by a third, but admission effects were 60% lower than expected; 
 this gap was more pronounced for high-ability students. Using linked survey
 -administrative data, we empirically test for social incentives, biases in 
 subjective beliefs about ability, and disutility from preferential seats (s
 tigma) as potential mechanisms. We find support for the last two. We then d
 evelop and structurally estimate a dynamic model incorporating them. We fin
 d that stigma explains 36% of the admissions gap. Belief biases do not expl
 ain the gap on average, but they help explain its widening with ability: by
  distorting pre-college effort investments, widespread overoptimism compres
 sed (amplified) the admissions of high- (low-)ability students. Therefore, 
 we identified frictions that can prevent preferential admissions from achie
 ving their intended objective.</span></p>
DTSTAMP:20260529T195149Z
DTSTART:20220519T043000Z
DTEND:20220519T180000Z
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR