BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:207afa230b8c78e56428e5ca6baab19a
CATEGORIES:Seminars
CREATED:20180703T151013
SUMMARY:Ethan Kaplan - University of Maryland
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal
 ;"><strong>Excess Capacity and Heterogeneity in the Fiscal Multiplier: Evid
 ence from the Recovery Act</strong> joint with Arindrajit Dube, Thomas Hegl
 andy and Ben Zipperer</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: no
 rmal;">Abstract:</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;
  line-height: normal;">We estimate local multipliers using cross-county var
 iation in expenditure in the ARRA. We use within state variation, and inclu
 de other demographic controls as well as a predicted employment control usi
 ng an industry shift-share measure. We find that counties receiving more st
 imulus expenditures had followed parallel employment trends prior to the AR
 RA as compared to other counties. We estimate an average annualized employm
 ent multiplier of 1.211 job-years per $100K spent per county resident. We f
 ind strong evidence of heterogeneous treatment effects: the employment resp
 onse is much greater in counties hit harder by the Great Recession, and hen
 ce with likely greater excess capacity. In below median excess capacity cou
 nties, the employment multiplier is 0.39. In above median excess capacity c
 ounties, the multiplier rises to 2.83. These findings imply that an employm
 ent-maximizing stimulus package targeted to high excess capacity counties w
 ould have created 83% more (3.60 million) jobs. While our findings are cons
 istent with state-dependent fiscal multipliers, the heterogeneity is not du
 e to the zero-lower bound since our cross-sectional variation in excess cap
 acity holds the interest rate constant. Instead, our findings suggest that 
 the spatial variation in multipliers reflects variation in the depth of the
  recession across different labor markets. Consistent with the evidence on 
 hysteresis, we find that the employment impact of the stimulus was long las
 ting and have likely persisted through the current expansion.</p>
DTSTAMP:20260403T183527Z
DTSTART:20190530T163000Z
DTEND:20190530T180000Z
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR